Local elections are to be held next year, tentatively on 30 May, and negotiations regarding new electoral rules are underway. Local elections are not only important for their contribution (at least in principle) to local government, they are also a dress rehearsal for the 2012 and 2013 parliamentary and presidential elections. The electoral campaign, election day, and the postelectoral count and handling of appeals will all be indications of government and political party commitment to democratic practices. No less significantly, local elections -- particularly for the Tbilisi city council and mayoral races -- will define many of the leading actors in the next national elections.
There are a few pressing issues. The first -- which I'm surprised has received so little attention -- is the matter of officially setting an election date. Local elections were supposed to be held in the fall, but as a concession to opposition parties, the government offered to hold early elections in the spring (30 May, just over six months from now). However, no date has been officially fixed. According to the electoral code, the date of an early local government election is tied to the date that local government bodies will be dissolved. In principle, this means that the president can keep opposition parties guessing as to the official date of elections by announcing a snap dissolution and -- as mandated by law -- schedule new elections within 45 days, leaving parties (and election administrations and monitors) little time to prepare. There is a precedent for this kind of politics -- in the 2006 elections, the government took full advantage of its right to set the date of local elections just 40 days in advance. If the government is committed to holding local elections on 30 May, a more formal declaration is in order.
Personally, I'm not convinced that moving the schedule up for local elections is really that useful an idea (and at the time it wasn't really taken to be much of a compromise). The "Code of Good Practice" of the Council of Europe's Venice Commission suggests that no amendments to electoral laws should be introduced within one year of an election. Given the extensive reworking of local election rules that is underway, a 12-month period is probably appropriate. Still, none of the parties that plan to participate in local elections appear to object so far to the early date.
17 November 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I feel that I will be here for hours reading everything as I’m an information junkie.
ReplyDeleteVery nice and impressive article you have posted. Its very helpful, i have read and bookmark this site and will recommend it to more other peoples.
ReplyDeleteHope there will be more wonderful things in your blog. Happy every day!
ReplyDeleteWonderful article,thanks for putting this together! "This is obviously one great post. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here. Keep it up!"
ReplyDeletei really like this post thanks very much
ReplyDeletewooooooow great! It's looking So wonderful.... Really It's an amazing post found here, Very interesting. my gratitude to you.
ReplyDeleteGreat info! super thanks!
ReplyDeleteCesped Artificial Precios
Cesped Artificial Barato
My hats off to everyone that's out there helping and for the rest who are making it possible for them to be there.
ReplyDeleteThe electoral campaign, election day, and the postelectoral count and handling of appeals will all be indications of government and political party commitment to democratic practices.
ReplyDeleteAs I website owner I conceive that the content material here is rattling first-rate , thanks for your efforts.
ReplyDelete